- The subject individual is being evaluated on Character, Intelligence, and Capability. He/she is being rated on each of the evaluation criteria indicators based on evidence and previous demonstrations of strength and weakness for each requirement, using a scale of 1-5
- 5 = Very Strong. Outstanding.
- 4 = Strong. More than acceptable.
- 3 = Acceptable. Adequate. Meets requirements.
- 2 = Somewhat weak. Less than acceptable.
- 1 = Very Weak. Poor
- Average or acceptable scores 3.
- In cases where insufficient information exists to provide a rating, the indicator is scored a "three" to neutralize the rating.
Evaluation Questionnaire: Version 1.1.3
All scores and weightings are illustrative. They are not final.
The Rizal Robredo Index Evaluation Questionnaire
INDIVIDUAL BEING RATED: __________________
Score Summary:
Category
|
Max Points
|
Max Possible Score
|
Actual Score
|
Pct Achieved
|
Points Awarded
|
1. Character
|
30
|
72.5
| |||
2. Intelligence
|
30
|
65.0
| |||
3.a. Capability – Skills
|
20
|
60.0
| |||
3.b. Capability - Results
|
20
|
30.0
| |||
Totals
|
100
|
Methodology:
Category 1: Character
|
30 Points
|
Covers
integrity, honesty, honor, courage, bravery, discipline, dedication to good
deeds, and dedication to family, community, moral beliefs, and nation.
Line No.
|
Indicators
|
Score
|
Weight
|
Adj Score
|
1.1
|
Puts
the public interest first; is passionate about the well-being of family,
community, nation
|
2.0
|
||
1.2
|
Leads
with moral authority: displays integrity and honesty; does good deeds
|
2.0
|
||
1.3
|
Has
the confidence and courage to be open-minded; encourages contributions from
others
|
1.5
|
||
1.4
|
Is transparent,
truthful and accepts accountability; supports freedom of information
|
1.5
|
||
1.5
|
Displays
the maturity and confidence to resolve conflicts; is not interested in
winning arguments for the sake of winning
|
1.0
|
||
1.6
|
Demonstrates
discipline, sound judgment and courage in his public acts
|
1.0
|
||
1.7
|
Refrains from
abuse of power by shows of disrespect or intimidation or by unethical
inducement
|
1.5
|
||
1.8
|
Understands that
religion is a private matter apart from State activities
|
1.0
|
||
1.9
|
Is
independent of political dynasties, wealthy businessmen, or special
interests
|
1.0
|
||
1.10
|
Is free of
criminal record, civil unrest charges, plagiarism and other acts of
intellectual dishonesty ; free of civil service law infringements
|
1.0
|
||
1.11
|
Has a clean record
on financial and other transactions both publicly and privately
|
1.0
|
||
1.12
|
Uses government
resources properly for government work not private advantage.
|
1.0
|
||
1.13
|
Does not own
foreign property or have overseas junkets at taxpayers’ expense; his/her
future is in the Philippines
|
1.0
|
||
TOTAL
ADJUSTED SCORE
|
||||
MAXIMUM
ADJUSTED SCORE POSSIBLE
|
||||
PERCENT
OF MAXIMUM ACHIEVED
|
||||
POINTS
AWARDED (Percentage applied to total points available)
|
Category 2: Intelligence
|
30 Points
|
Covers
educational achievement, variety of experiences in career or personal
endeavors, expressions in writings and speeches, and academic awards or
honors.
Line No.
|
Indicators
|
Score
|
Weight
|
Adj Score
|
2.1
|
University
achievement (multiple degrees and honors scores higher)
|
1.0
|
||
2.2
|
Postgraduate
achievement
|
1.5
|
||
2.3
|
Understanding
of economics and finance
|
1.5
|
||
2.4
|
Understanding
of management principles
|
1.5
|
||
2.5
|
Understanding
of computers or technical subjects (engineering)
|
1.0
|
||
2.6
|
Understanding
of law and constitution
|
1.0
|
||
2.7
|
Knowledge of language and
methods/approaches/tools for communicating effectively
|
1.5
|
||
2.8
|
Demonstrations of innovation and flexibility (openness
to change)
|
1.5
|
||
2.9
|
Demonstrations
of judgment and risk assessment (decisiveness)
|
1.0
|
||
TOTAL
ADJUSTED SCORE
|
||||
MAXIMUM
ADJUSTED SCORE POSSIBLE
|
||||
PERCENT
OF MAXIMUM ACHIEVED
|
||||
POINTS
AWARDED (Percentage applied to total points available)
|
Category 3a: Capability - Skills
|
20 Points
|
Covers
leadership skills. Government leadership requires professional abilities to
plan for the future, innovate, assess risk, measure performance,
and adjust to find workable solutions.
Line No.
|
Indicators
|
Score
|
Weight
|
Adj Score
|
3a.1
|
Articulates
a clear and inspiring vision; good at team-building and motivating
|
1.0
|
||
3a.2
|
Inspires
others through actions; good role model
|
1.0
|
||
3a.3
|
Is a
problem-solver and innovator; can lead and manage change
|
2.0
|
||
3a.4
|
Works
systematically; is well organized; focuses on important tasks and priorities
|
1.5
|
||
3a.5
|
Influences
and convinces by reason rather than emotion and intimidation
|
1.0
|
||
3a.6
|
Harmonizes;
works well with others; listens and respects constituents' opinions
|
2.0
|
||
3a.7
|
Works
hard without excessive absences or diversions
|
1.0
|
||
3a.8
|
Has
foresight; is able to project into the future
|
1.5
|
||
3a.9
|
Is mentally alert and committed to lifelong
learning and self development?
|
1.0
|
||
TOTAL
ADJUSTED SCORE
|
||||
MAXIMUM
ADJUSTED SCORE POSSIBLE
|
||||
PERCENT
OF MAXIMUM ACHIEVED
|
||||
POINTS
AWARDED (Percentage applied to total points available)
|
Category 3b: Capability - Results
|
20 Points
|
Covers
demonstrated on-the-job achievement. A strong leader will have an extensive
history of tangible, productive outcomes under his jurisdiction.
Line No.
|
Indicators
|
Score
|
Weight
|
Adj Score
|
3b.1
|
Has
broad managerial experience; multiple jobs with increasing responsibility
|
2.0
|
||
3b.2
|
Has
produced strong results (bills sponsored, projects implemented, other deeds)
|
3.0
|
||
3b.3
|
Has been popularly
recognized for work achievements (awards, honorary degrees, citations)
|
1.0
|
||
TOTAL
ADJUSTED SCORE
|
||||
MAXIMUM
ADJUSTED SCORE POSSIBLE
|
||||
PERCENT
OF MAXIMUM ACHIEVED
|
||||
POINTS
AWARDED (Percentage applied to total points available)
|
References and Links
|
Ref No.
|
Title
|
Source
|
Author
|
Date
|
Biography Timeline
|
1958 – 2012
|
Year
|
Milestone
|
Source
| ||
Affiliations
|
Class
|
Affiliation
|
Source
| ||
No comments:
Post a Comment